Thanks to technology, student in medicine, nursing, and other patient care roles can be put thought simulations with patient mannequins. “Mission control” is behind a two-way mirror and can “talk” for the patient, monitors are “connected” to give real-time data, and a lot of sterile saline is used as various medications.
Last Friday, rather than work the floor in my clinical rotation, I volunteered to be a nurse during medical student simulations. These students just entered their 4th year of med school and were beginning their month of ER rotations. The role of the nursing student was to act as the nurse for the simulation: assess, advocate for the patient, collaborate with the physicians, and administer medications while the doctors continued to formulate a care plan. We were not being graded or evaluated, the med students were.
It. Was. Awesome!
My fellow nurses and I got one other benefit over the doctors: we were able to go through the simulations twice. Group 1 rotated from 8-10 and Group 2 rotated 10-12. The first simulation was a practice for all of us – what was I to ask the doctor? The patient? Focus on in regards to care? What information did I need to assist the doctors and the patient? Because of the nature of simulations and how much students should not know before participation, I will refrain from specifics of the scenarios. All three were common emergencies, and one involved pediatrics. I was thankful for two semesters of Med-Surg, so I was way more comfortable with these scenarios than I would have been in January.
I felt as though I hit a stride as a nurse that second time around – the other nurse and I knew the outcomes and what to watch for while the med students were new to the situation. Also, the group the second time around had a GREAT sense of humor. I was asking for more clarity in orders: how much oxygen do you want? What drug and what dosage? Is that an order or an idea? Do you really want to give that heparin sub-Q when the patient already has IV access? By the way, your patient has below 85% Oxygen saturation for the last minute.
At the end of the day, one area stood out: patient advocacy. During one simulation, the benefits of morphine were being debated. Yes, the patient could have been given it, but it doesn’t improve mortality. Thus to a doctor’s mind, there was not convincing enough evidence to warrant a morphine administration. With Group 1, I didn’t push back on the students to order a pain killer. With the second group, I questioned.
“He’s in a lot of pain. Could we give him something for that?”
“Nah. Morphine doesn’t help long term.”
“What about Fentanyl or something else.”
(Voice from speaker) “The simulation is over.”
In post-conference, we talked about the simulation, when drugs were given, and the plan of care. We were about ready to leave when I stated my point. “Just one thing from the nurses. When it came to whether or not to give morphine, I know it does not solve the root cause of this patient’s problem, but to that patient, his pain is why he’s here. Giving half to 1 mil of morphine will ease anxiety, knock the pain down, and to that patient, you are doing something. As nurses, we’re trained to assess and we’ll hear a lot about a patient’s pain. Again, it’s not solving the root issue, but you are doing something. And that will get you far with them.”
My point was not ignored. Instead, the medical school instructor VALIDATED my point.
“That is a good point. As medical students, you need to know that by the time the nurse has time to call you to change or up the pain meds, she’s heard about it at least 12 times.”
I could have kissed that man.